Yahoonews reported, November 6, 2016, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”.
With every headline and article I read, written by democrat party apologists or agents, or liberal media personnel, I am sometimes discouraged by the headline if not the actual news. I am clearly an anti-establishment supporter: the clintons being the most establishment entity in government today.
But I know, without exception now, that I always find discrepancies, contradictions and inconsistencies, if not outright lies and whacky fabrications, in every article or “NEWS” item published by any dem/lib.
Garver’s article, if I were to accept that he is relating some truth or fact, could be quite deflating. But he is simply regurgitating models and predictions, not actual polling.
Patience, my fellow American readers, I will make my case.
Furthermore, I dare not read an article from any source without some preponderance as to the truths I will find, naturally hoping to find parties I believe to be dishonest: have maybe, somehow, decided to be honest. Am I actually looking for truth? Yes. Do I find it in liberal media? You, dear readers, will have to read on and decide what is truth and what is not. To preface that I ask you, do you want to know the truth?
If I thought that voting for an avowed socialist, Bernie Sanders, for example, would be in the best interests of America and Americans, I would have been a staunch supporter. The impediment to that is that I know the history and proper application of the terms left-wing, right-wing, and volumes of related information. I understand tyranny and how it germinates and burgeons. I have studied the founding fathers’ efforts to keep America free of tyranny (by any name), and can see through the fraud of socialism. I have studied the writings and arguments for different parts of OUR Constitutional Republic, as presented to knowledgable Americans, in the days of breaking free of Britain.
I have studied the sources for the founding fathers’ insights, the ancient Greek city states. I have come to different conclusions from my contemporaries in a few areas, and theorized about many things. I have written articles for my arguments. Some of my commentaries can be found at earnwrite.com, author brent.
One of my claims and commentaries is that socialism is not a political system. It actually has characteristics of politics but nothing of the representative process. These things are different, you ask. Read on.
Socialism is a system of lying, cheating and plunder. It is an economic system subjected to and pushed by centralized political force: which is not representative power. Socialism does not remedy inequality of income and wealth. When one group is robbed to give to another there is always a cost, an inequality. There is no production from the middle man, people in government.
Even middle men in business produce something. Middle-men typically provide a service of either delivering or marketing. What service do socialist politicians deliver, stealing from one to give to another? Who is served, besides the politician?
Socialism starts with a big lie, that government can produce something: equality. Equality cannot be produced nor can it be achieved except when all are reduced to common denominators, poverty and ignorance.
Equality can never be achieved because some do more with the same amount of rsources. Both denominator and numerator must be controlled for equality, and it cannot be forced upon people to do less when brains expand ideas differently.
Struggling for existence in ignorance makes all men equal. Even that extremely low denominator does not make equality. Adaptability is the key to survival and growth. Socialism, the political process of centralizing power, wealth and initiative in the hands of a few self-appointed superiors, must destroy adaptability: initiative and capital. Capital comes in many forms and the socialists, the marxist democrats and bolshevik progressives know this. Capital is initiative, or labor and investment. Investment can be money or goods.
Being forced to compress and remain totally stifled upon ruler command, is close to equality. It is the total incapacity to survive, and that is what centralized dementocrat tyranny wants. The agents boast of equality, but refuse to explain the variables that must be destroyed: variables that cannot be wiped from the nature of man, any man or woman. To enforce socialism, marxism, utopia is the impossible dream, to eradicate mankind from man. Transforming people into beasts of burden is the only way. Ignorance, fear and instinctual responses such as sexualizing everything is how people turn their neighbors into beasts of burden. Who does that today?
It is the ignorance variable that makes all equal. A ruler that promises equality knows the task of forcing ignorance to the depth of animalism, is the continuing challenge and role he or she must take.
The lies and fraud that follow the big lie are designed to hide that first big lie, and move people along to accept tyranny and plunder, by many names that seem innocent. There is no innocence in taking from others by law. Frederick Bastiat referred to this as legal plunder.
Do we read to acquire information? Do we not all listen to the NEWS for information? Do we hear NEWS because we want to be deceived? This seemingly innocent statement should be qualified. It has been said we trust those most who lie to us best.
The headline, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”, surely sparks some kind of emotion from anyone that reads it: for some elation, for others disappointment and even anger. This article, and articles like it, always inspire me to find the stink-bombs of fraud and deception.
Part of tyranny’s fraud and deception is manipulation. Surely, if you are a democrat supporter or a liberal, you are already discounting my words, even though I have barely stated anything against your beliefs or the democrat political machine, or in criticism of liberals manipulating behind the scenes.
I am certain I have stated something you will be able to use to excuse your information gathering quest. But if you miss the point, you miss much more than you can afford. If you refuse to read anything you miss out. If you want the gold you have to get right in the muck and mud, and dig. Neither gold nor truth jump at you and proclaim, ‘here I am’. Fool’s gold will do that and there is a reason fools seek fool’s gold in NEWS and truth.
Some dig for information to arm themselves for further deception. Some like to arm themselves with misinformation because they are afraid of truth. How can one be afraid of something he or she knows not? It is the darkness of dark, the darkness of ignorance, and the light of reality that give us cause to fear.
I hate green beans although I have never tasted them. How do I know I hate them? Is it because I have other information that tells me what I imagine they will taste like? From where did I get this other information, and is it correct? Can I be wrong? How could I possibly be right when green beans have a unique flavor, like all foods?
How can I, or anyone, be right in presumption without reading? How can I be right that I will not like what I fear to read because of the title? Is the title correct? Is the initial presentation of information correct or true? How could I or anyone know if I do not read the article, dissect it and compare the knowledge received with the claim(s) of the title?
The question to you, then, is, ‘what dreadful result of reading “opposing views” for information and truth do you imagine in your mind?’
What fear do I imagine when I read the title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”?
Am I afraid it is true?
As sentient beings we get overwhelmed with what we imagine we cannot sort through and understand. As a result of this seemingly overwhelming task, some people stick to the simple truths, or familiar biases that are not always true. The titles of so much of what we read or hear seem true but can truth actually be found in titles?
For example I can claim ‘math is easy’. Do you, dear mathematics student, now know math?
Trump will win. Do you now know it?
Those who manipulate you want you to believe the simple titles because there is no substance to claims they make, and thus their work, if it can be called that, is done: or so they presume.
Those who profess and proclaim by titles and clichés, experience no embarrassment or ridicule. They become demagogues of superficial titles and headlines. They become their own sources of truth, by lies and fraud, all to hide the lack of substance. For example: explain to us the characteristics of democracy and how it applies to our representative system in America.
Have you, dear reader, ever heard a democrat or liberal explain it? To explain it would reveal the deception and fraud.
When the news reports a one or two sentence claim, it is a title, nothing more. The truth of any news is not found in the title, or the title-like news casts that give us one-line clichés and manipulative emotional blasting. The truth is found digging below the apparent NEWS, all of it, and getting in the muck and mud of substance.
The title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”, caused an emotional response for myself, as it was designed.
However, I have learned to not panic, and I did not. But, does it relate truth and reality? Can the author explain how Trump cannot win? Those who talk in circles of things others do not understand, and do not take time to explain the process, advantages and disadvantages, do not want intelligent followers.
Can I state a title with respect to the author of “If This Poll is Right Trump Cant Win Florida – – or the Election”? Here is my headline: Garver does not want anyone to think for themselves.
Can I explain that, or will you simply believe it? Why would you believe a title of one who tries to not explain by dwelling in the ethereal arena of misrepresented headlines?
Ah, but you do not know until you read and find the substance.
So the question comes to us, before reading any title or hearing any “title-like” news report or news cliché: what do you hope to gain by reading any news or any title? Will you investigate further or be manipulated by clichés and potentially false terms and/or words in titles?
Another example: Read the headlines of political news reports. Titles and “reports” often have the words democracy and America in the same sentence. If you do not notice democracy and America in the same sentence or title, then search for one example of Constitutional Republic in a sentence with America. Do we assume, as a result, that America is a democracy? Some do. I never did believe it. I looked for myself. You can too, or just believe what you want.
The initial statement of Garver’s article tries to set a presumption in the reader’s mind, if the reader has not heard opposing views or if the reader decides to accept the title because of the source, that a “poll” is a “poll” because a reporter reported it. Is that true?
Polls today, the day before the election and for the past two years have reported nothing but favorable wins and conditions for democrats.
And we can find opposing information, that will smother a few polls and any researcher woking for “truth”.
Does public education have opposing views? Is this where children learn? Garver’s is an article I would want to read for the NEWS value of it but I admit, my mind is tainted, biased, suspicious because of the absolute deception and fraud I have experienced, refuted and correct, by dem/libs and apologist liberal media. Even that, I acknowledge is a bias. But even a biased report can be dissected and truth extracted from it.
In Garver’s article I quickly found contradictions and poor reporting, as I knew I would,
But you, dear reader, may have your own bias that everything you receive from democrat/liberal sources is truthful, or you might find that it is not democrat or liberal sponsored and supportive.
You may believe polls are objective and accept that polls reveal truth, reporting just what is found in unbiased polling and questioning. At a glance, in any article, I can now find the duplicity of all democrat and liberal writers. I do not include “all” lightly.”
Now you, dear investigator, can journey with me through Garver’s article and find truths and lies, if there be any. Will a truth cause you some emotional pain? Yes, but I can tell you that finding the truth and accepting one truth, and that one truth on its own merits, for what it really is, liberates the soul. Every step, every truth one finds is another nail pushed out of your coffin of slavery: ignorance.
Ignorance is slavery, for the ignorant, because there are those who use ignorance to manipulate others. Are you, dear fellow American, a fool, trusting others’ words without question or curiosity? How did that human trait become washed from your soul?
So, what is a poll? Do you, dear fellow American, understand every aspect and word of that “title”?
No. So few do. The ones who understand are the ones manipulating the results.
A poll is not 100 percent polling.
Like global warming, there are so few professionals involved, it would cause amazement, wonder and confusion, at how these so-called experts arrive at their conclusions and predictions, and fool us all.
Global warming has zero scientists, although democrats and liberals refer to the “global warming community”, as if it existed.
Find a scientist in the global warming community that has actually done a scientific experiment or taken measurements. There is nobody. How can one be a scientist if one does nothing scientific? How can one be a baseball player if one does nothing “baseball”?
Dig, for yourselves, and find the truth.
There are so few pollsters, the number is insignificant.
How many people, experts would we suspect are part of a “think tank”? What is a think tank?
A think tank is a handful of readers and writers that fabricate “information”, from an extremely limited amount of input, while they pretend to create scenarios from their superior intellect.
To sound intelligent and expert, they “spin”: a reference to spinning yarns, stories. “Pollsters” are think tanksters, they spin “intelligence” from an extremely limited number of people actually polled. Mostly what they do, is twist and fabricate stories that will be accepted after the fact of something sinister and hidden. Has any dem/lib mentioned that polling is mostly computer-generated predictions and models based on old data? Who does not want you to know that?
Like the global warming community, that uses models and computer-generated predictions, based on political remedies for apolitical fabrications, the think-tanksters/pollsters do the same.
Most of the “polling” is taken from biased models and think tanksters that are trying to create credibility for the inevitable incredulity.
The think tanksters/pollsters insert words, change meanings of words, and add contradictory words that shake one’s thoughts, and give the impression that the writers and “think tanksters” are intelligent. This a very few other tactics tricks millions every time.
Polling is a series of models: numbers and think-tanksters , fabricated interpretations. It could be biased but nobody would know until he or she studied polling, rhetoric (grammar) and looked at the questions think-tanksters ask. Have you done that?
Polling is like non-scientific, non-existent scientists in the non-existant global warming community. It is all done by models chasing political compliance for a fabricated fear.
A democrat party poll, is a biased fabrication of democrat/liberal opposition always making the opposing views lose. Look up a term, dialectic advancement, and you will know why democrats appear to lose, some time.
The polls are rigged and the ballot counting is rigged.
Is that a simple, manipulative title? Sure, until you check it out.
I spend more time reading opposing “NEWS” than conservative or republican/republic NEWS. What trashing can I do to truth? What critique do I have with truth without fabrication and deception? None, so I cannot “bash” conservative, historically-correct truth.
For example, America was founded as a democracy. NO. False.
America was founded as a Constitutional Republic. Oh, is that true? Is it important to know? Why would it be important to know?
Are the characteristics of democracy and Constitutional Republic different, and is one better than the other? What would make one better than the other? If we qualify the question with, ‘for who is either system better, and how’, we might be getting closer to some reality.
Who would, in the first place, not want Americans to know the truth of whether America was founded as a democracy or a Constitutional Republic? Who mentions “democracy” continually in their titles? Do constitutional supporters mention democracy in their titles? Do conservatives mention democracy in the same sentences as America? No. The two simply do not go together and do not belong in the same sentence or concept together. Why?
What truth or truths are you failing to learn and know by not being told America was founded as a Constitutional Republic?
What truth or truths do you not learn or know as a result of believing the title, “If This Poll Is Right Trump Can’t Win Florida – – or the Election”?
Before we begin to know that, we must dissect the title. You, however, must determine if you will accept truth when you find it. If you will not then you must realize you are rejecting truth: fact that will benefit yourself, and those around you. That is quite a responsibility.
It is important to know that once you have internalized truth it is not difficult to maintain. Once you know a truth you do not have to relearn it. Compared to lying, and trying to make connections of lies that surely must follow, truth is liberating. Furthermore a truth learned releases other truths from the bondage of fear.
In this case, I boldly state, elections are rigged always in favor of the democrat party. Mistakes would be made in favor of all parties involved, but that is not the case for the innumerable mistakes made in the 2016 election, and prior elections.
The youtube videos abound in the thousands. Secret interviews, explanations, redefining terms and words as their original intents and meanings, and innumerable sites and expose´s can be found and you will learn
I cannot even begin to list them.
But know this, Garver makes no references to anything that will educate you, my dear fellow citizen.
Please. Dear fellow American, do an internet search for black box vote. Check out Hillary meltdown. Anne Coulter has some great interviews and makes super points. Look up voter fraud, Petition Project.
How about Huma Abedin connections to Islam? Check out Fast and Furious gun running, Benghazi interviews, Trey Gowdy, Jason Chaffetz.
Look in the NEWS and find something, and research it until you have the truth. You will know truth. When you find a series of statements and apparent truths, and they connect easily, you have truth.
For example, We have a Bill of Rights. WE live in a Constitutional Republic system of self governance. Are the two connected and can they stand on their own?
Why do We, Americans, have a Bill of Rights? Do all democracies have a Bill of Rights? Would it surprise you to know that there is no such thing as a Bill of Rights anywhere in the world except in America? A Bill of Rights, is unique to OUR Constitutional Republic. Is someone trying to turn your, OUR Constitutional Republic into a democracy, with no individual rights? Who would do such a dastardly thing? Which rights will you, my fellow citizen, voluntarily surrender, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of self-determination, Freedom of commerce, ownership, presumption of innocence?
Find the truths you want. Do it now before you vote for tyranny. You had better ask, and you had better want to know, ‘which party is tyranny’? You had better know because if you make a mistake the losses you wish on others, history shows irrefutably, will either enslave or kill YOU! Search for and boldly face whatever fear this “title” has caused you, and be free.
Liberal News Review 