Cool charts and graphs make dem/lib dogma and religion very science-ish, to deluded dem/libs.
Fabrications with inflated numbers also do the trick, dem/libs think.
Love that graph of water and vapor and stuff, and there, at the top of the page, a star for the Louisiana flood. Very scientific. I drew a graph. I had a star and some cool lines, and x and y projections. Do I sound sciencish? Is that all it takes to impress loser libbies?
I made a graph and showed three circles of intersecting stuff, with the title: Global intersections against time frame compartments. Sounds cool, huh? Then I added some text below. “The consensus, according to this chart, shows temperatures are cooling globally”. Then I lied about what Pelosi said and added, “see, global trends show cooling”.
Because I want to sound science-ish, all I have to do is fool myself and my resultant, pretentious credibility should be convincing for others: after all, I am a good actor.
Acting, is everything.
Next lesson: how to pretend to be a doctor by carrying a scalpel and speaking medical language. Repeat these words: I looked at your charts and think we should try a new drug.
My fellow Americans, a scientist DOES science. A scientist does NOT sit in a room with a green wall behind him or her, and regurgitate “weather”.
99 percent of global hoaxers are NOT in a laboratory.
They are NOT in a laboratory setting.
They are NOT doing studies.
They are NOT doing research.
They are NOT measuring anything.
They are NOT standing at the shoreline with a pen and clip board.
They are NOT at either pole taking temperatures. Nobody is at either pole except for military personnel. The poles are off-limits to civilians.
The 99 percent global hoaxers are NOT taking notes.
They are NOT doing experiments.
There are NOT looking or observing.
99 percent of global hoaxers are not even sitting in rooms with other weathermen (posing as scientists) and deriving consensus on anything.
They are NOT doing science in any way, shape or fashion.
99 percent of global hoaxers do not know they are global hoaxers.
There is no community of global scientists. They are not science-ing anything and they are not compiling notes, taking notes, or even thinking of taking notes.
They have nothing to measure or take notes for, and they do NOT even have a reason, a cause, and theory, or hypothesis to use a note to remind themselves to take notes. They do NOT have funding for anything. and so they get jobs and work at jobs.
There is no global science community. It is a fabrication that grows and shifts according to the propaganda needs of the moment.
They are NOT sitting in committees convening or consensussing anything.
They are not going to conventions, doing online work. They are NOT trading notes because they have none. they are thinking of trading notes they might have, if they ever did anything science-ish.
99 percent of global hoaxers are doing NOTHING even remotely related to science.
But here is the piece de resistance: 99 percent, maybe 100 percent of global hoaxers are not, NAAAAAWT connecting observations to claims: empty or just fabricated. To describe the deep fraud of it all, “climate scientists” can e seen in many places, doing all kinds of observing but we never see one, NEVER see a single “climate scientist showing results of the effects of the observed causes. We never see “climate scientists showing connections, math, for example. We never see “climate scientists” showing the orocess that connects a mountain of observations with a black-hole of effects, claimed or referenced. There is no science where there is not scientific method. Scientific method includes, hypothesis, procedures, variables, formulae, isolation of a variable for measure, pre-test and post test, control group or control element, and collation and interpretation of data, among a few other aspects.
Observation and claim, all there is to “climate science” is grotesquely inadequate in determining if an ant farts or the moon is made of cheese. Child-id morons, all those who pretend to present science, or think they are presenting “climate” anything.
They have degrees in fields related to acting, figure skating and entertainment, but they are not doing science. They are being used. They work at jobs and it is a popularity contest: NO SCIENCE, NOT A SHRED
Welcome to dem/lib “science”.